I
have seen every Pixar film as it has come out, but a few of them predate my
efforts to write down my thoughts, so those have to wait for me to have a
repeat viewing before I jot down any impressions. I was going to have to qualify that with a statement that I didn't actually catch Planes, but that was Lasseter working with Disneytoon, so it turns out I don't have to. One of the films I never got around to writing anything about was A Bug’s
Life, which I don’t think I’ve properly watched since the early 2000s.
Though it shows its age now, A Bug’s Life still thrives on its heartfelt
story, likeable ensemble cast and ambition – and besides, we make allowances
for 90s CG. Even if the fact is that if it came out today, it would be called
badly-done, we are aware how pioneering it was at the time, how much better
than contemporaneous video game intros – and, indeed, Antz – it looks,
and as a result make allowances for it. Besides, vibrant older animation
looks quite a lot like some highly
advanced claymation in any case.
The story of A Bug’s Life
isn’t a thousand miles from Timon’s story in The Lion King, especially
if you’ve heard his cut verse from ‘Hakuna Matata’. Flik works in the ant
colony, paying his dues, though he doesn’t accept without question the
prevailing view that not only is an ant’s life one long grind, but that their
lot in life is to not only gather food for themselves but for the big, mean
grasshopper gang as well – an option not explored by Aesop, I must say. When
one day, just before the ‘offering’ to the grasshoppers is made, one of the
crazy inventions Flik makes to try to speed up the harvesting process goes
awry and knocks the entire feast the colony has prepared into the water that
surrounds the ants’ little island. His carelessness makes him the outcast of
the society for a while, but when he seizes on the idea of going out into the
wider world to seek ‘warrior bugs’ who will fight off the grasshoppers, the
elder council see it as either suicide or a very lengthy waste of time – so
agree to let him go.
In the ‘city’, Flik does
indeed find some big, tough-looking bugs, but what he doesn’t know is that
they’re actually circus performers. They think he’s a talent scout, he sees
them getting lucky enough to knock out some flies, and there’s a classic
misunderstanding. However, once everyone realises the mistake, Flik still
tries to cover everything up by devising a plan of his own. Meanwhile, the
grasshoppers debate what’s really at the heart of this film – the fact that
when a small minority oppress and effectively enslave a larger group, they end
up using fear to avoid rebellion, but how long can revolution be held off? It’s
a fascinating mirror to historical events, and gives thought-provoking
analogies to racial conflicts of the past.
First and foremost, though, of
course this is a kids’ comedy about a misunderstanding, revolving around
insects. The most memorable element of the film is the collection of insects
who make up the circus – personalities made to reflect or invert expectations
about how a particular insect is expected to behave. There’s the beautiful
butterfly girl, the rather doddery old mantis who plays a mystic, the ladybird
who of course wants to be seen as a tough guy, the big fat ridiculous
caterpillar and…well, Niles from
Frasier in stick insect form. They work brilliantly together, and Pixar
stalwart John Ratzenberger does well making his flea ringmaster likeable
despite him being the one to not only fire our heroes but inadvertently messes
up their more high-minded plots not just once but twice.
Perhaps the biggest problem
with this ensemble is that Flik – quite intentionally – looks a lot like all
the other ants (four-legged to look less freaky, I assume). Amidst such a cast
neither he nor his princess love interest really stick in the mind, and the
everyman hero becomes rather forgettable. But at the same time, there’s a point
made there about the unremarkable one being able to be brave enough to stand up
for himself…though as histories of war unfortunately show us, most invading
forces wouldn’t have threatened so much killing and never managed it.
The bad guys are also
well-crafted, with Kevin Spaacey having a marvellous time as the lead baddie
and his dimwitted brother in the comic foil role is also not so absurd that he
irritates. There’s a crazy feral grasshopper, too, who gets one of the best
moments in that sadly now-gone institution of early Pixar – the fake blooper
reel during the credits. This one may be the best of them all.
A Bug’s Life doesn’t
quite have the universality of Toy Story, the emotional wallop of Up,
the cuteness of Wall-E or the frenetic energy and beauty of Finding Nemo, but it has so much of each of them that it still comes near the top
of any essential-Pixar list.
I saw A Bug's Life when it first came out in the theater and didn't like it that much. I hardly remembered anything about it, unlike other early Pixar movies I also saw in theaters like Toy Story and Monsters Inc. I actually never saw Bug's Life again until just a couple of years ago (when I was unemployed and had a lot of free time). I liked it better than I did as a kid, but not as much as other Pixar films. The story wasn't anything special to me as I've seen the whole ongoing misunderstanding, liar revealed, and average everyman proving himself stories many times before. But what I did really enjoy about it is the fact that the characters are bugs and all the unique ways the setting is designed to convey that, like how the bug city is made of human trash items and how they use thimbles as cups and how a cute little bird can seem so vicious...stuff like that is a lot of fun. So yeah, not my favorite, but still a decent movie.
ReplyDelete