Does
Ted really belong on an animation blog? It’s a live-action film with its
eponymous character animated. That means it actually contains a relatively
small amount of animation. Why include this, but not the Star Wars prequels,
which have CG-animated elements in almost every shot, or The Return of the
King, with Gollum such a major part and plenty of other CG characters? Yet
I have already included Who Framed Roger Rabbit? and plan to eventually
include classic Tom & Jerry ‘animations’ like Anchors Aweigh.
But those are presented as animated characters existing in a live-action world,
as a story element or a gimmick, while Ted is more of an attempt to have its
animated character appear as part of the live-action world, similar to the Lord
of the Rings and Star Wars usages of CG. But the main difference
I’ve fixed on is that this is contextually in the framework of a creator known
for his animation – Seth MacFarlane. That’s why it’s on my animation blog.
Not
that you’ll find any other MacFarlane works here. I’ve seen a lot of Family
Guy, a fair bit of American Dad and a few episodes of The
Cleveland Show too. But I only like to blog things I’ve completed, and
it’ll probably be a very long time before I watch an entire season of any of
those shows, for despite the wild popularity of Family Guy amongst my
friends while I was at uni, I’ve never liked it much. I don’t like MacFarlane’s
humour or sense of timing. I find all of the shows somewhat like a bitchy,
aloof Perez Hilton type looking at pop culture and American society and rolling
their eyes, making little sniping comments, and it gets on my nerves. I don’t
like the riffing-on-a-single-line-with-whole-scenes humour South Park picked
up on. I don’t like the reliance on stereotypes and gross-out humour, which
needs the cheeky Pythonesque modesty to work without coming over as vicious.
And without characters I care about in the least, it all becomes dull.
So
I expected to really dislike Ted, which seemed to be a surreal cartoon plot put
on the big screen with Marky Mark playing the same role he always plays these
days. So I was happily surprised to find I really enjoyed it. After an awkward
start right out of Family Guy pastiching 80s movies, in which the
punchline is that even the Jewish kid everyone beats up at Christmas bullies
main character John – while getting beaten up – it all gets quite likeable. The
outline is such a familiar rom-com storyline that it’s a little awkward – a
beautiful, successful woman has a boyfriend wasting his life, clinging on to
his childhood and continually messing up social occasions by slipping off to
party, and needs to learn to grow up and stop being selfish while not losing
the boyish charm that makes him so sweet in the first place – while the girl
needs to learn not to force him to be a different person altogether.
The
unique element, of course, is Ted himself, a magical bear brought to life in a
Christmas story. This central idea is quite a funny one – what happens when the
boy in the cheesy Christmas story grows up and needs to lead a real life with
the magical bear who is his best friend forever and ever? Especially when the
bear, who had a brush with celebrity, has grown up too, and is a disgusting
sex-obsessed stoner?
The
film succeeds on three counts: firstly, it doesn’t make its rom-com structure the
figure of mockery. What would have killed this for me would be it to be wryly
poking fun at the tropes it’s relying on – it takes its love story seriously
and thus, while unoriginal, it works. Secondly, it’s genuinely funny – the
jokes are hit-and-miss and sometimes go too far, but by and large it’s
extremely funny, especially with its early-80s nostalgia, particularly where it
comes to Flash Gordon. It also relies on its animation heritage in some silly
little side-jokes that seem surprising stylistically outside of animation, like
the final punchline about the fat kid growing up, or the only fart joke in the
film that shouldn’t have been cut, where three diners have an extreme reaction
to it. Sometimes there are awkward moments where a random side-reference is put
in (like the one to The Wall) where if you get it, you have a little
chuckle, but in the cinema at least become quite aware that a lot of people
around you didn’t understand and are just a bit confused and uncomfortable, but
at least MacFarlane doesn’t string out these asides into painful sketches, and
they’re kept tastefully-timed. Finally, it succeeds in actually presenting an
interesting dilemma by showing both sides of John’s life as appealing. The
‘grown-up’ side may have been a little dull and passionless in a social sense,
but it involved a sweet love life, money and a future. The ‘kid’ side was
self-destructive, idiotic and led to a miserable dead-end single life, but the
parties were amazing and the seize-the-day mentality led to great experiences.
The balance was surprisingly deftly-woven, and made John very sympathetic.
It
wasn’t perfect, and its flaws were large and obvious, but Ted was at the
very least much funnier and much more heartfelt than I had expected, so ranks
as one of the better cinema surprises of the past few years.